Skip to main content
shopping_cart

Your shopping cart is empty

The administrative penalty regime - A swinging reminder or just swinging paper?

Published on 05 Mar 10 by NATIONAL DIVISION, THE TAX INSTITUTE

This paper explains how the penalty system works and tests the correctness of the following propositions:

  • the purpose of penalties is to punish bad behaviour
  • the Commissioner does not impose penalties
  • if it's not my fault or I don't get a benefit, I will not be penalised
  • the Commissioner's remission power should be exercised only in exceptional circumstances
  • the penalty "safe harbour" under the Tax Agents regime is safe
  • the chances of the AAT or the Court overturning the Commissioner's penalty decision is high.

Author profile:

Author Photo - Paul Sokolowski CTA
Paul Sokolowski
CTA
Paul is a Partner of Arnold Bloch Leibler and the practice leader of the firm’s taxation practice. He provides strategic and technical advice to a diverse range of Australian and international clients, including high net worth individuals, some of Australia’s largest family groups and public corporations. Paul regularly acts in significant and complex audits, disputes and litigation.
Current at 30 June 2015 Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Paul SOKOLOWSKI.
 

This was presented at 25th National Convention.

Get a 20% discount when you buy all the items from this event.

Individual sessions





Bamford v Federal Commissioner of Taxation

Author(s):  Terry MURPHY

Materials from this session:


Bamford v Federal Commissioner of Taxation

Author(s):  Mark L ROBERTSON

Materials from this session:










International tax - An update

Author(s):  Lee BURNS

Materials from this session:

TOFA ATO impacts

Author(s):  David HUME

Materials from this session:








The capital v revenue distinction for labour costs

Author(s):  Frank DRENTH

Materials from this session:




Further details about this event:

 

Copyright Statement