When you need the<br>latest tax knowledge

When you need the
latest tax knowledge

Taxation in Australia

Taxation in Australia journal image 201112

Written by practitioners for practitioners Taxation in Australia® is continually ranked as Australia's leading tax journal. With a readership exceeding 35,000, it is published 11 times per year and available exclusively to Institute Members in hard copy and online format, and now as an App on the Apple iPad. This comprehensive publication features articles with a strong, practical approach to the latest tax issues and professional development. It is affectionately known as the Blue Journal.

To find out more about downloading the journal to your iPad visit our dedicated web page: taxinstitute.com.au/ipad

Articles from the current issue:

  • Trust streaming post-Bamford Add to cart

    01 Feb 2012

    The High Court decision in the Bamford case in 2010 raised uncertainty about the operation of the provisions in tax legislation which confer "flow-through" status on capital gains and franked dividend amounts appointed to specific beneficiaries of trusts. The government's response was to enact amending legislation designed to ensure that, for the 2010-11 and later income years, where a trustee has the power to appoint or stream capital gains and/or franked distributions (including any attached franking credits) to specific beneficiaries, this will be effective for tax purposes.

    This article examines in detail how the new provisions work and provides examples. It is pointed out that the calculations necessary to work out who is assessable on what part of a capital gain or a franked distribution that has been streamed to a particular beneficiary are highly complex, and the timing
    rules will put significant pressure on trustees and their advisers.

  • Costs orders against the Commissioner of Taxation Add to cart

    01 Feb 2012

    The decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court in Clark's case in November 2011 concerned the ability of taxpayers to obtain a costs order, including an indemnity costs order, against the Commissioner of Taxation.

    This article examines the decision in the context of relevant court rules and existing case law. The court confirmed that the Commissioner is subject to the same rights and obligations that any other participant in commercial litigation. As a result, offers of compromise need to be properly considered by the Commissioner. It is not enough for the Commissioner to claim that a costs order should not be awarded against him on the basis that he was complying with his own policies or procedures, or that indemnity costs should not be ordered against the Commissioner on the basis that he has duties of administration of the taxation regime, and an obligation to pursue questions that have a wider legal significance.

  • The High Court’s approach to taxation special leave applications Add to cart

    01 Feb 2012

    While there is no one factor that ensures success in a High Court special leave application, a tax issue with "wide-spread application" significantly increases the chances of the application being granted. Counsel who are able to frame the matter in these terms are then much more likely to be successful.

  • Reportable tax positions: A recent innovation by the ATO Add to cart

    01 Feb 2012

    The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has recently added a powerful weapon to its arsenal of information-gathering procedures by requiring large corporations to make early disclosure of significant tax positions taken which may not be sustained when analysed at a later time.

    This article considers the meaning of the core concepts relating to a reportable tax position (RTP), and problems relating to the application of those concepts from the perspective of the taxpayer and the revenue authority. The ATO initiative is based on, but materially different from, a regime introduced in the United States in 2010 by the Internal Revenue Service. The RTP regime has been introduced by the ATO as a pilot group program for the 2011 financial year, although important features remain unresolved.

Print Email
SHARE THIS

Related Content