New value shifting regime: a quest for certainty or legislative overkill?
01 Feb 07 |
AUSTRALIAN TAX REVIEW
Issue: Vol. 36 no. 1 2007
The general value shifting regime (GVSR) was introduced on 1 July 2002 with the aims of delivering "significant integrity benefits", providing for a "solid base", introducing a "more consistent treatment for more comparable value shifts across entities and transactions" and removing "unintended outcomes" arising from the legislation being "too broadly defined in parts", as described by the Review of Business Taxation. As this article will endeavour to demonstrate, the GVSR rules have not achieved these aims, but are instead overly-complex, poorly targeted, prone to prolixity, obsessively anti-avoidance, overly-layered with exemptions and, ultimately, in their execution, will be bedilled by disoutation.
This item is not available for download from this website. Please contact the Tax Institute library for assistance. Charges will apply.
Lachlan is the leader of KPMG’s Indirect Tax practice
in China and a member of KPMG’s Global Indirect Taxes leadership
team. He was formerly a director of The Tax Institute, and leader of
KPMG’s Indirect Taxes and Tax Controversy practices in Australia
prior to his relocation to China in 2011. In his current role, Lachlan is
assisting multinational companies transition to VAT in China. He is a
frequent presenter and media commentator on VAT issues in China,
and is currently advising China’s Ministry of Finance and State
Administration of Taxation on several tax reforms, including VAT and
- Current at
27 August 2012