Automatic pension reversion - still worthwhile?
19 Nov 13 |
AUSTRALIAN SUPERANNUATION LAW BULLETIN
Issue: Vol 25 No 2 Oct 2013
Pages: pp 24-27
This article focuses on automatically reversionary pensions (ARPs) and examines their appropriateness in the wake of the new pension rules, which differ quite significantly to what the industry thought they would look like. The bottom line is that ARPs have a strategic role to play.
This item is not available for download from this website. Please contact the Tax Institute library for assistance. Charges will apply.
Daniel Butler, CTA of DBA Lawyers
Daniel is one of Australia’s leading SMSF lawyers and has worked predominantly in
the SMSF, tax and related fields for over 30 years. He is a regular presenter on SMSF
topics and has published extensively in professional journals including contributing a
monthly article on SMSFs to the Taxation in Australia and other media. Dan is a
member of the ATO’s Superannuation Industry Relationship Network (SIRN), the Chair
of the Tax Institute’s National Superannuation Committee, a member of the Law
Institute of Victoria’s Tax Committee, and is involved with a number of other tax and
SMSF committees and discussion groups. Dan presents on the subject Taxation of
Superannuation at the University of Melbourne’s Master of Laws/Tax program. Dan is
also a Specialist SMSF Advisor.
- Current at
26 February 2018
Tina is a Consultant for DBA Lawyers.
- Current at
22 July 2013