Your shopping cart is empty

Automatic pension reversion - still worthwhile?

Publication date: 19 Nov 13 | Source: AUSTRALIAN SUPERANNUATION LAW BULLETIN

Issue: Vol 25 No 2 Oct 2013

Pages: pp 24-27


This article focuses on automatically reversionary pensions (ARPs) and examines their appropriateness in the wake of the new pension rules, which differ quite significantly to what the industry thought they would look like. The bottom line is that ARPs have a strategic role to play.

This item is not available for download from this website. Please contact the Tax Institute library for assistance. Charges will apply.

Author profiles

Daniel Butler CTA
Photo of author, Daniel BUTLER Daniel is one of Australia’s leading SMSF lawyers and has worked predominantly in the SMSF, tax and related fields for over 30 years. He is a regular presenter on SMSF topics and has published extensively in professional journals including contributing a monthly article on SMSFs to the Taxation in Australia and other media. Dan is a member of the Tax Institute’s National Superannuation Committee and is involved with a number of other tax and SMSF committees and discussion groups. Dan also presents on the subject Taxation of Superannuation at the University of Melbourne’s Master of Laws/Tax program. Dan is also a Specialist SMSF Advisor. - Current at 04 August 2020
Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Daniel BUTLER.
Tina Conitsiotis
Tina is a Consultant for DBA Lawyers. - Current at 22 July 2013
Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Tina Conitsiotis.