Automatic pension reversion - still worthwhile?
19 Nov 13 |
AUSTRALIAN SUPERANNUATION LAW BULLETIN
Issue: Vol 25 No 2 Oct 2013
Pages: pp 24-27
This article focuses on automatically reversionary pensions (ARPs) and examines their appropriateness in the wake of the new pension rules, which differ quite significantly to what the industry thought they would look like. The bottom line is that ARPs have a strategic role to play.
This item is not available for download from this website. Please contact the Tax Institute library for assistance. Charges will apply.
Daniel Butler, CTA of DBA Lawyers, Daniel is one of Australia’s leading SMSF lawyers and has worked predominantly in the SMSF, tax and related fields for over 30 years. He is a regular presenter on SMSF topics and has published extensively in professional journals including contributing a monthly article on SMSFs to the Taxation in Australia and other media. Dan is a member of the ATO’s Superannuation Industry Relationship Network (SIRN), the Chair of the Tax Institute’s National Superannuation Committee, a member of the Law Institute of Victoria’s Tax Committee, and is involved with a number of other tax and SMSF committees and discussion groups. Dan presents on the subject Taxation of Superannuation at the University of Melbourne’s Master of Laws/Tax program. Dan is also a Specialist SMSF Advisor.
- updated by Kathy Xu for Super Day 3180522
- Current at
30 April 2018
Tina is a Consultant for DBA Lawyers.
- Current at
22 July 2013