Published on 01 Jan 03
by Australian Tax Research Foundation
This study into the Superannuation Surcharge Tax or SST concludes that SST is inefficient, inequitable,has high compliance costs on the superannuation industry, significantly increases some taxpayers’ effective marginal income tax rates and lacks transparency within the overall tax system.
The SST is a hidden tax, with significant effects on the industry, many so-called higher income earners and, indirectly, on nearly all superannuation fund members. While it generated $699 million in revenue in 2000/01, tax compliance costs of the SST on the superannuation industry was around $76 million or 11% of SST tax revenue. The research found a significant impact on marginal income tax rates such as the case of taxpayers with high superannuation contributions where the rate went from 48.5% up to between 64.2% and 67.6% for taxable incomes between $65,720 and $79,802 in 2000/01.
A key finding is that SST is now impacting at relatively lower income levels than when first introduced, and close to the highest-rate threshold of $60,000 for certain taxpayers who have high superannuation contributions. In its survey of the superannuation industry the research found that around 80% of fund managers rated the abolition of SST as a high priority.
Van Le, at the time this article was written, was a Research Assistant in the Schools of Economics & Finance, and Business Law, Curtin University of Technology. Van was completing degrees in Commerce at Curtin University and Law at The University of Western Australia,
and was to take up a Graduate Position with the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. Current at 12 October 2012
Prafula is a Lecturer in Business Law at Curtin University.
Current at 23 September 2003 Current at 19 November 2004
Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Prafula FERNANDEZ.
Current at 14 December 2012
Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Jeff POPE.