shopping_cart

Your shopping cart is empty

The Full Federal Court (Gyles, Stone and Young JJ) has allowed the Commissioner's appeal from the decision of Edmonds J, who had dismissed the Commissioner's appeal from a decision of the AAT remitting in full penalty tax imposed on a taxpayer for non-disclosure, notwithstanding the fact that the taxpayer had not included any ground in their notice of objection requesting remission. Edmonds J held that s 43(1) of the AAT Act conferred jurisdiction on the AAT, as the decision to require remission was relevant to and "for the purpose of reviewing the [objection] decision". However, the Full Federal Court held that the Commissioner's decision to impose penalty tax was an "ineligible income tax remission decision" within the meaning of s 14ZS of the Taxation Administration Act and therefore not a "reviewable objection decision" for the purposes of s 14ZQ of that Act: FCT v Hornibrook [2006] FCAFC 170 (Full Federal Court; Gyles, Stone and Young JJ; 28 November 2006).

For a copy of the decision, go here

Media Release Search
Keywords
Eg. TD 2005/D52 ALL words EXACT phrase WITHOUT words Date range
From To