Skip to main content

Your shopping cart is empty

Does streaming trust income still work? The ATO's New Era for Trusts The Decision Impact Statement on Bamford

Published on 17 Jun 2010 | Took place at Swissotel Sydney, Sydney , NSW

On 30 March 2010, the High Court handed down its judgment in Bamford & Ors v Commissioner of Taxation. The High Court decision in Bamford has widely been considered to be confined to two narrow issues:

  • the meaning of “income of the trust estate”
  • the meaning of “share” and the application of the proportionate approach
The ATO’s Decision Impact Statement on Bamford released on Wednesday 2 June 2010 treats the Bamford decision as raising many other issues which are fundamental to the taxation of trusts. These issues include:
  • whether franking credits can form part of distributable income
  • whether other notional amounts can form part of distributable income
  • whether “streaming” works for tax purposes
  • the relevance of financial accounts in determining trust income.
The Decision Impact Statement also explains what ATO rulings and practice statements will be withdrawn or altered as a result of their now public views.
    This event discussed the impact on the drafting of distribution minutes for the current financial year and into the future.

Individual sessions


Author(s):  Lance CUNNINGHAM This presentation covers:

  • the high court decision
  • income of the trust
  • characterisation of income & gains
  • proportional view
  • streaming
  • franked dividend streaming
  • compliance action
  • capital gain streaming.
Materials from this session: