Published on 01 Feb 12
by "THE TAX SPECIALIST" JOURNAL ARTICLE
The results of the Commissioner’s compliance activities in the GST area have started to flow through into the courts as taxpayers seek to challenge the Commissioner’s positions on audit. Recent court decisions on the tax have demonstrated the importance of testing interpretive positions in the courts and the benefits that can flow to taxpayers as a consequence of a successful challenge.
This article examines the options available to taxpayers who wish to challenge the Commissioner’s position through litigation. The article first examines the reasons why a taxpayer may wish to litigate a matter, including some of the myths and misconceptions about litigation. The second part of the article examines the options available for taxpayers who, having considered these matters, proceed to litigation. When considering these options, the article considers the impact of recent changes to the Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth) and the approach of the courts and the Commissioner to alternative dispute resolution.
Emily works for Lindsay Taylor Lawyers.
- Current at
15 September 2017
Jeremy Geale, CTA, is the ATO’s Deputy Chief Tax Counsel. He, together with the Chief Tax Counsel and other deputies, leads the ATO Tax Counsel Network, which provides technical and strategic tax advice to other areas of the ATO and the community. Jeremy joined the ATO in January 2016. He was previously a partner with KPMG, where he led KPMG’s Tax Controversy Practice. He was also instrumental in establishing KPMG’s broader legal practice in Australia and was a member of KPMG’s Global Steering Committee for Tax Controversy. Jeremy also worked for a number of years as a barrister specialising in all areas of tax, as a lawyer at Minter Ellison and was the GST Manager at Qantas. He has a unique blend of experience having worked in a variety of roles across the private sector, professional services and public sector.
- Current at
03 October 2017