Your shopping cart is empty

The ATO response to the IGT … make haste slowly


In June 2014, a report by the Inspector-General of Taxation (IGT) on the Australian Taxation Office’s (ATO’s) management of transfer pricing matters was released. The report made 18 recommendations. The ATO “agreed” with 17 in whole or in part or in principle. This article examines the IGT report and the ATO’s response to it, and finds that that response is unfortunate in some respects, in that six of the IGT recommendations have been agreed to only in part and there are no agreed timelines to address others. There is concern at the failure of the ATO on a number of fronts, including its failure to agree to allocate decision-making power on all transfer pricing compliance activities to transfer pricing specialists, and its failure to commit to a timetable within which it will evidence a “sense of proportion” to transfer pricing matters in the case of smaller and low-risk taxpayers.

Author profiles

Stuart is an Associate Director with Moore Stephens.
Current at 1 September 2014
Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Stuart EDWARDS.
Daren YEOH
Daren Yeoh, a Senior Tax Manager with Moore Stephens is a leading advisor on the implementation of AASB 112. Daren has assisted, advised and presented to medium and large corporates around Australia in relation to implementing the new standard using the Moore Stephens Tax Effect Accounting Toolkit. Daren is the lead product manager of the Toolkit and played a key role in the design, development and testing of the Toolkit. Daren's practical experience allows him to provide a clear and methodological approach to a complex area.
Current at 19 December 2005
Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Daren YEOH.


Copyright Statement
click to expand/collapse