The age of the home worker – Part 1: Deductibility of home occupancy expenses

Published on 01 Dec 18 by "AUSTRALIAN TAX FORUM" JOURNAL ARTICLE

The number of workers including employees that make use of their home to work has increased considerably in recent years. The authoritative court cases on the deductibility of home office occupancy expenses, the main ones being rent of premises and interest on home loans, were decided in a past era of work practices that differed from current work practices, including the rise of the mere contemplative (knowledge) worker. Given the extent of taxpayers with outstanding home loans (35% of Australian dwellings) and the extent of renters of homes (31% of dwellings), the deductibility issue is significant.

Author profiles

Dale Boccabella CTA

Dale has 18 years experience teaching a wide range of Australian taxation law courses at both undergraduate and postgraduate level including goods and services tax, fringe benefits tax, taxation of companies, tax administration and tax avoidance. Dale is currently teaching at the University of New South Wales and has also published over 70 articles on a wide range of areas of Australia’s taxation system. - Current at 29 May 2019

More by Dale BOCCABELLA

• The age of the home worker – Part 2: Calculation of home occupancy expense deductions, deduction apportionment and partial loss of CGT main residence exemption - 01-April-2019
• Taxation of SMSF capital gains where total super balance exceeds $1.6m: Can trustee use unapplied net capital losses? - 10-May-2017
• Negative gearing – is another judicial view possible? - 20-June-2016
• Recording entitlement rule in trust streaming provisions allows for creation of mismatches - 01-April-2016
• Pattern of distributions test for discretionary trusts: Defects reveal questionable policy design and implementation - 01-August-2015
• Defective pattern of distributions test guarantees revenue loss usage - 01-October-2014
• Extinguishment of tax attributes (eg losses) on death under Australia’s income tax is anomalous and inequitable - 01-September-2013
• Managing losses - Traps for the unwary paper - 18-May-2010
• Should CGT asset cost base inclusion take priority over the black-hole expenditure section? - 14-December-2008
• $250 deduction denial for expenses of self-education : retention of section 82A is a mystery. - 01-August-2008
• Do cost base rules take priority over the black-hole expenditure section? - 09-April-2008
• Enactment of a deduction rule regarding travel between workplaces or income producting activities can lead to errors. - 01-December-2007
• Are mortgage discharge fees and expenses "borrowing costs"? - 28-September-2007
• Continuity of Business Test and large company tax losses: Yes, No, Perhaps and Yes again. - 01-June-2007
• Share sales at amounts significantly in excess of market value on long-dated payment terms. - 01-May-2007
• CGT: the - 21-July-2006
• Home Loan Unit Trusts Arrangements - analysis of application of Part IVA - 01-December-2003
• Home loan unit trust arrangements: nature and quatum of advantage sought and analysis of tax effectiveness under the non-part IVA provisions - 01-June-2003
• Home loan unit trust arrangements: nature and quatum of advantage sought and analysis of tax effectiveness under the non-part IVA provisions - 01-June-2003
• Home loan unit trust arrangements: nature and quatum of advantage sought and analysis of tax effectiveness under the non-part IVA provisions - 01-June-2003
• Home loan unit trust arrangements: nature and quatum of advantage sought and analysis of tax effectiveness under the non-part IVA provisions - 01-June-2003
• Home loan unit trust arrangements: nature and quatum of advantage sought and analysis of tax effectiveness under the non-part IVA provisions - 01-June-2003
• Home loan unit trust arrangements: nature and quatum of advantage sought and analysis of tax effectiveness under the non-part IVA provisions - 01-June-2003
• Home loan unit trust arrangements: nature and quatum of advantage sought and analysis of tax effectiveness under the non-part IVA provisions - 01-June-2003
• Home loan unit trust arrangements: nature and quantum of advantage sought and analysis of tax effectiveness under the non-Part IVA provisions - 01-June-2003
• Home loan unit trust arrangements: nature and quantum of advantage sought... - 01-June-2003
• Was the ATO too quick in rejecting a cash basis of 'incurred'? against a standard split loan - 01-June-2003
• Inconsistent treatment is hard to justify - 01-February-2002
• Business cars - sold into trouble? - 01-January-2002
• Selling business cars - another pitfall for the unwary - 01-December-2001
• When and how to use the GST property margin scheme - 01-September-2000
• Australia's tax reform rejects or modifies fundamental tax principles - 01-June-2000
• Tax practice: Ralph Report: retaining a work in progress advantage under the Ralph Report - 01-May-2000
• Cash flow/tax value method: platform for accruals taxation indelibly planted - 01-March-2000
• Conveyancing and property - 01-February-2000
• Continuity of business tests facilitate the transfer of tax attributes under Australia's income tax: technical issues and policy justification - 01-January-1999
• FCT v Rowe: will the High court overrule itself - 01-April-1996

Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Dale BOCCABELLA.

Kathrin Bain

Kathrin is a Lecturer, School of Taxation and Business Law, UNSW Business School, UNSW Sydney - Current at 29 May 2019

More by Kathrin Bain

• The age of the home worker – Part 2: Calculation of home occupancy expense deductions, deduction apportionment and partial loss of CGT main residence exemption - 01-April-2019
• Matters affecting taxpayer confidentiality - Taxipedia leaks paper - 19-May-2011
• The influence of alternative model tax treaties on Australian treaties - 01-March-2011

Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Kathrin Bain.