Skip to main content
shopping_cart

Your shopping cart is empty

  • Home
  • Alternative assets insights: The Sojitz case: Implications for landholder duty and TARP

Alternative assets insights: The Sojitz case: Implications for landholder duty and TARP

Member Price: $22.00
Non Member Price: $28.00

DisclaimerThis material is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

Published on 01 Apr 15 by "TAXATION IN AUSTRALIA" JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Sojitz case considered whether Queensland mining leases were landholdings, but it has broader implications – when is an asset taxable as “land”?

Author profiles:

Costa Koutsis CTA
Costa CTA, is a Partner with PwC specialising in stamp duty and other indirect taxes. Costa has advised on indirect tax consequences for a range of transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, restructures and structured property and financing transactions across a variety of industries. Costa is a member of The Tax Institute's New South Wales Office of State Revenue Liaison Committee. Current at 07 March 2016 Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Costa KOUTSIS.
 
Rachael Cullen
Rachael is a Director at PricewaterhouseCoopers. Current at 01 April 2015 Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Rachael Cullen.
Copyright Statement

 

About us

Contact us

State Office Contacts

Connect

About Us | Contact Us | Help | Privacy, Copyright and Disclaimer | Conditions of Use | Sitemap | Social Media

© 1996-2016 The Tax Institute (ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016)) All rights reserved.The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.