Your shopping cart is empty

Rectifying deficient binding death benefit nominations


The decision of the Supreme Court of Queensland in Munro’s case establishes that, in order to be effective, a purported “binding death benefit nomination” needs to comply with the formal requirements of the superannuation fund deed, and/or relevant superannuation legislation. Any deviation will cause the nomination to be invalid, and therefore not binding on the trustee of a superannuation fund.

This article examines the decision and its implications for the drafting of binding death benefit nominations. In the author’s view, the case is a reminder to practitioners that pre-emptive measures can be taken to set out a person’s actual, subjective intention when entering into documents, and that relief may be sought to remedy a situation where the legal effect of a document differs from the subjective intent. The article discusses the nature of a binding death benefit nomination, and whether equity can rectify a power of appointment and voluntary settlements.

Author profile

Denis Barlin CTA
Denis is a Barrister at 13 Wentworth Selborne Chambers. He advises on taxes generally (both federal and state taxes), superannuation, equity and trusts, as well as asset protection. Denis also conducts disputes as an advocate in both state and federal tribunals and courts. - Current at 02 June 2015
Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Denis BARLIN.


Copyright Statement
click to expand/collapse