Your shopping cart is empty

The MAAL and the diverted profits tax - A comparative


A diverted profits tax was proposed by the federal government in the 2016-17 Budget. A multinational anti-avoidance law (MAAL) was enacted in late 2015. Both the MAAL and the diverted profits tax focus on multinationals that derive $1b or more in group income. The diverted profits tax is proposed to be applicable for income years following 1 July 2017, but to arrangements whenever they were entered into. This means that the development of the diverted profits tax should be closely monitored and risk mitigation should be considered.

This article compares the MAAL and the diverted profits tax to demonstrate where they intersect and the differences between them, and to highlight how these regimes provide a new framework for multinational taxation in Australia. The article also considers example structures to demonstrate where the MAAL and proposed diverted pr ofits tax pr ovide the ATO with two additional avenues to attack structures which concern it.

Author profile

Joanne Dunne CTA
Photo of author, Joanne DUNNE Joanne Dunne CTA is a Director at PwC, Melbourne. She is a former tax partner at law firms in both Australia and New Zealand. She has more than 20 years' tax experience in general income tax, corporate tax, international tax and tax controversy. She is recognised as a leading tax lawyer by a number of independent legal guides including Doyles Guide, and is a member of a wide range of professional organisations, including acting as co-chair of the Tax Institute's Tax Disputes Committee. - Current at 31 May 2017
Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Joanne DUNNE.


Copyright Statement
click to expand/collapse