Published on 01 Jun 15
by "THE TAX SPECIALIST" JOURNAL ARTICLE
Prior to the late 1990s, there were no specific provisions giving relief from significant tax exposures that arose when implementing corporate restructures. Since that time, the introduction of scrip-for-scrip relief (1999), the tax consolidation regime (2002) and demerger relief (2002) have without doubt facilitated numerous corporate restructures and takeovers that could not otherwise have been implemented.
This article focuses on some of the more important problem areas and anomalies that exist in the application of the scrip-for-scrip, demerger and consolidation provisions in the context of takeovers and corporate restructures. In addition, reference is made to some issues associated with distributions that may relate to a takeover or restructure. The article primarily focuses on restructures involving corporate entities, and does not seek to address issues that can arise in relation to transactions involving trusts or trust structures.
Edward Consett, ATI, is a Director in the Melbourne office of EY. He advises on the tax issues for medium to large-scale infrastructure transactions,including privatisations, PPP, renewable energy and secondary market transactions. Edward is a Member of Chartered Accountants Australia & New Zealand, a Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Victoria and a lecturer at the University of Melbourne.
- Current at
05 May 2018
Ken is a Special Counsel in the Melbourne office of Greenwoods & Herbert Smith Freehills. He has been closely involved for many years in advising Australian and foreign-owned listed companies on M&A transactions and has been extensively involved with both clients and tax professional bodies in relation to all aspects of the tax consolidation regime. Ken is a past President of The Tax Institute.
- Current at
23 August 2016