shopping_cart

Your shopping cart is empty

  • Home
  • The concept of control in Div 6C

The concept of control in Div 6C

Member Price: $35.00
Non Member Price: $45.00

DisclaimerThis material is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

Published on 01 Apr 17 by "THE TAX SPECIALIST" JOURNAL ARTICLE

The ATO released two controversial documents affecting infrastructure investments early this year. The first document was TA 2017/1, which highlights the ATO’s concern with stapled structures that attempt to re-characterise trading income into passive income to attract concessional tax treatment. The second document was the draft Privatisation and infrastructure – Australian federal tax framework, which updates and expands on documents previously released by the ATO. Both documents have caused a degree of disquiet to investors and advisers who are grappling with what the ATO’s stated positions mean to their investments. The focus of this article is on the concept of “control” for the purposes of s 102N(1)(b) in Div 6C. The authors hope that an appreciation of the issues currently arising might inform the process of developing a framework that will ensure that appropriate levels of taxation are paid while having a minimal effect on business confidence and efficiency.

Author profiles

Terrence Murphy QC, CTA
Terry has focused on advising and appearing for taxpayer and revenue authorities in the Federal Court and High Court and in alternative dispute resolution for over 30 years. He was appointed to be the Special Counsel to the Australian Taxation Office from 2008 to 2010, is a member of Taxation Subcommittee of the Law Council, Chair of the Tax Group Advisory Board, and a Senior Fellow of the University of Melbourne Law School. - Current at 05 November 2019
Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Terry MURPHY.
Dr Dr. Julianne Jaques CTA
Dr Julianne Jaques, CTA, is a barrister specialising in taxation law. She has particular expertise in disputes involving complex commercial transactions and was counsel for the Commissioner in the Bywater matter in the High Court concerning corporate residency. Prior to coming to the Bar, Julianne spent 10 years in private practice with a major law firm and a major accounting firm. She is a Chartered Tax Adviser and a Chartered Accountant, and her doctoral thesis at the University of Melbourne was on the taxation of corporates. Julianne is a member of the Tax Practitioners Board and the Board of Taxation. In March 2020, Julianne was awarded Chartered Tax Adviser of the Year - Current at 16 December 2020
Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Julianne JAQUES.

 

Copyright Statement
click to expand/collapse