The Bamford decision and trust net income ... the saga continues.
24 Jun 09 |
CCH TAX WEEK
Issue: Issue 24 2009
Pages: pp. 1-5
This article will review the two major issues considered in the Bamford decision and briefly comment on their practical implications. These issues are likely to be of critical significance for the taxation of trusts in Australia.
This item is not available for download from this website. Please contact the Tax Institute library for assistance. Charges will apply.
George Hodson, CTA, is a Partner at Thomson Geer. George advises on a range of taxation, transactional, business structuring and tax controversy matters. He acts for a range of private, public and government clients and works closely with businesses, high net worth groups, not-for-profits, accountants and other professional advisers. He has extensive experience in taxation advisory as well as dispute resolution with revenue authorities. George presently sits as the chair of the SA Technical Resource Committee and on the National Dispute Resolution Committee with The Tax Institute.
- Current at
09 December 2019
Peter heads Cowell Clarke's tax and revenue practice group. He advises and acts for a wide range of public and private companies as well as for the trustees of self managed superannuation funds. Peter’s areas of expertise include: income tax (as it impacts on business and high net worth clients); capital gains tax; goods and services tax; state taxes and superannuation law. Peter is regularly involved in advising SMSF trustees on issues associated with superannuation income streams. Peter is a member of the Australian Institute of Company Directors and the SMSF Professionals Association of Australia Ltd in addition to being a member of the Tax Institute’s South Australian State Council.
- Current at
08 October 2019