State taxes Payroll tax Land tax

Re-defining the land tax base in highly urbanised locations

Source: Australian Tax Forum Journal Article

Published Date: 1 Sep 2014


Despite numerous calls for land to contribute more to government revenue, the difficulty governments confront is that recurrent land taxation is assessed on a number of different bases both within Australia and internationally, and not all are economically efficient. While there is broad support for a base which reflects unimproved land value in that it reflects highest and best use since taxing it will not influence what improvements are made on the land, in practice the existing use of capital improved value is most often adopted even though it is not an economically efficient base.

If increased revenue is to be raised from an efficient land tax, the base must be efficient. While unimproved land value is an efficient base, as there are few  vacant land sales available in highly urbanised cities, there is a paucity of information and evidence on which to determine unimproved land value. As a result of this paucity tax liability assessment is neither simple nor transparent when determining land value using improved property transactions.

This paper argues that two issues must be resolved if an efficient, simple and transparent land tax is to operate in Australia. Firstly, that whether this base is land value or the value of land and improvements, the base must reflect highest and best use. Secondly, whichever base is chosen, particular attention must be given to the simplicity and transparency of the valuation process. Using simulations for land valuers, and surveys of the rationale for their responses, this paper provides insight into the relatively little understood practices and preferences of valuers when determining the unimproved land value.

The paper finds that if capital improved value highest and best use is the preferred base of land tax (given vacant land transactions are absent), then improvements must reflect highest and best use and the valuation process must be codified when accounting for the added value of improvements in a way which ensures that what results is a base which is economically efficient, simple and transparent to taxpayers, valuers and tax administrators.

Author Profile
Vince Mangioni

Sorry, this is subscriber only content.

To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.

(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).

Already a Subscriber? Login now

Already a Subscriber? Login now


The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.

Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))


The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009. 

Copyright Statement

All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.

Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.


State taxes Payroll tax Land tax Tax administration 2014

Share this page