Source: Australian Tax Forum Journal Article
Published Date: 1 Sep 2020
The streaming regime in Subdivision 115-C ITAA97, which was enacted after the High Court's decision in Commissioner of Taxation v Bamford (2010) 240 CLR 481 (Bamford'), is an integral component of the taxation of trusts in Australia. The main
purpose of the 2011 measures was to ensure that the streaming of capital gains (as well as franked distributions) to specific beneficiaries would be effective for tax purposes as the Government had assumed that the proportionate approach', which
was confirmed in Bamford, necessarily implied an inability to stream particular categories of income.
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Details
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
("TTI")
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.
Tags