Source: Taxation In Australia Journal Article
Published Date: 1 Oct 2005
The decision of the Full Federal Court in Commissioner of Taxation v McNeil  FCAFC 147 was handed down on 8 August 2005. The case raises some interesting tax issues which may have implications in characterising certain distributions made by a company to its shareholders for the purposes of s 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. The decision is also a first in interpreting certain terms of s 104-155 of the 1997 Act (CGT event H2).
Australian legislative responses to the BEPs report - The changes so far and what you should be thinking about! - Presentation 18 Sep 2013
Australian legislative responses to the BEPs report - The changes so far and what you should be thinking about! - Paper 18 Sep 2013
Capital & revenue distinction in tax matters - Presentation 10 Mar 2011
Tax Case 2 - Journal 01 Feb 2003
Tax Case - Journal 01 Oct 2002
The Commissioner's Good Faith - Journal 01 Jul 2001
Tax Cases: No Deductions, No Interest... No Kidding! - Journal 01 Feb 2001
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.