Source: Taxation In Australia Journal Article
Published Date: 1 Sep 2015
The decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court in Channel Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v FCT was the second of two decisions which have considered the interaction of Pt IVA (the general anti-avoidance provision) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 and the tax consolidation regime (the first was FCT v Macquarie Bank Ltd). In Channel Pastoral, the court held that Pt IVA could apply to a scheme or an arrangement involving the formation of a tax consolidated group, and that the correct entity to which to issue a determination and corresponding assessment (or amended assessment) is the group member which would have derived the tax benefit had the consolidated group not been formed.
This article examines the case in detail, outlines a number of implications, and argues that there is still confusion as to who should be the subject of a determination and an assessment in these situations.
More by Clint Harding
M&A: The public/private company dichotomy - Journal 01 Nov 2022
M&A and demergers - The public/ private dichotomy - Video 19 May 2022
M&A and demergers - The public/ private dichotomy - Presentation 19 May 2022
M&A and demergers - The public/ private dichotomy - Paper 19 May 2022
One of the founders retires - Audio 25 Nov 2020
One of the founders retires - Video 04 Nov 2020
One of the founders retires - Paper 04 Nov 2020
One of the founders retires - Presentation 04 Nov 2020
Corporate residency - A practical guide to ensuring your offshore subsidiaries remain non-resident - Presentation 23 May 2019
Corporate residency - A practical guide to ensuring your offshore subsidiaries remain non-resident - Paper 23 May 2019
More by Peter Scott
Australia’s new thin capitalisation regime - Journal 01 Aug 2024
Thin capitalisation - Paper 20 Jun 2024
Thin capitalisation - Audio 20 Jun 2024
Thin capitalisation - Video 20 Jun 2024
Thin capitalisation - Presentation 20 Jun 2024
Key Revenue vs Capital Principles - Presentation 13 Apr 2022
Key Revenue vs Capital Principles Case Study - Paper 13 Apr 2022
Key Revenue vs Capital Principles podcast - Audio 13 Apr 2022
Key Revenue vs Capital Principles - Video 13 Apr 2022
The single entity rule: The need to clarify the effect and limits of the cornerstone of Australia's tax consolidation regime - Journal 01 Sep 2020
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Details
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
("TTI")
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.
Tags