Source: Taxation In Australia Journal Article
Published Date: 1 Jul 2019
On 30 January 2015, Mr Pintarich paid $839,115.43 under the ATO's original letter dated 8 December 2014, believing that it compromised his disputed taxation debt of $1,156,787.72 by accepting his application for remission of the general interest charge (GIC) assessed to him. Mr Pintarich understood the ATO's letter to be a decision on his GIC remission application because the amount due by 30 January 2015 included all of the assessed primary tax and part of the GIC. The ATO then sent Mr Pintarich a letter demanding the payment of his allegedly outstanding GIC debt of $344,604.90 and formally disallowing his application for emission of GIC. The Federal Court and Full Federal Court dismissed Mr Pintarich's two appeals. This article discusses the difficulties in compromising taxation disputes with the ATO because the doctrine of estoppel does not apply to it, and suggests that the ATO would never have sought recovery of the additional GIC (by changing the meaning of its original letter) or pursued this case in response to the taxpayer's appeals under an independent Advocate-General of Taxation.
Case note: renunciation of beneficial interests in trusts since FCT v Carter - Journal 01 Oct 2022
A new approach to statutory interpretation by the Full Federal Court or merely a mistaken approach? - Journal 01 Feb 2021
Is the deemed in-house asset rule unconstitutional? - Journal 01 Nov 2018
An independent ATO appeals group is long overdue - Journal 01 Aug 2018
The doctrine of novation of contractual rights - Journal 01 Jun 2012
Merits review of state tax decisions by a court - Journal 01 Dec 2011
Dominant purpose: The Holy Grail of tax advisers - Journal 01 Oct 2011
Removal of the CGT trust cloning exemption - Journal 01 Mar 2009
Recent developments in payroll tax and land tax - Presentation 29 Mar 2006
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.