Published Date: 8 Feb 2024
This article considers some of the practical issues that a taxpayer faces in discharging the onus of proof in a “tax appeal” to prove that their assessment is excessive and what the assessment should have been. The focus is on a potential divergence of opinion that has arisen in recent Federal Court decisions as to whether the “all or nothing” approach to discharging the onus in default assessment cases is still valid, or whether a taxpayer can succeed to the extent that they can “chip away” at such assessment. This issue is considered in the context of default assessments issued under s 167 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) which adopt the asset betterment approach.
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.