The Tax Institute Submission | Decision Impact Statement — Addy v Commissioner of Taxation

Author: The Tax Institute

Published Date: 21 Feb 2022


Sorry, this is subscriber only content.

If you're not yet a subscriber, to gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.

Already a Subscriber? Login now

Already a Subscriber? Login now

The Tax Institute welcomes the opportunity to make a submission to the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) in relation to the Decision Impact Statement – Addy v Commissioner of Taxation (the DIS).

In the preparation of this submission, we have consulted with our national Large Business and International and Taxation of Individuals Technical Committees to prepare a considered response that represents the views of the broader membership of The Tax Institute.

The High Court's decision in Addy v Commissioner of Taxation1 (Addy) is of interest to taxpayers because it explains the operation and application of the anti-discrimination clauses of certain double tax agreements in the context of a working holiday maker (WHM). The operation and application of Australia's double tax agreements is a complex area for taxpayers and usually requires advice from an experienced and specialised tax adviser. This is compounded by the complexity of Australia's individual tax residency rules that require both an understanding of the legal principles and a comprehensive review of a broad factual matrix to apply the law correctly.

The Tax Institute's view is that the Addy case provides an opportunity for the ATO to provide greater clarity on these matters in the DIS. We consider that ATO advice or guidance that focuses solely on the issues addressed by the High Court's judgment will assist taxpayers in understanding how the decision affects their circumstances. Advice or guidance set out in the DIS should not go beyond those issues specifically considered by the court.

We are concerned about statements made by the ATO in the DIS for three reasons.

  1. Whether the ATO's position is technically correct, based on the operation of the tax treaty with the United Kingdom and having proper regard to the decision of the High Court.
  2. Whether the statements made by the ATO in the guidance materials are properly explained such that taxpayers can fully understand the different outcomes, based on the ATO's interpretation of the High Court's decision.
  3. Whether the interpretive statements made in the DIS should be published in the form of legally binding guidance, such as a Taxation Ruling or Determination, rather than by way of a DIS.


  • Published By:The Tax Institute
  • Published On:21 Feb 2022

The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.

Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))


The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009. 

Copyright Statement

All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.

Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.



Share this page