The Tax Institute Submission | TD 2021/D6 and PS LA 2021/D3 – Commissioner's discretion under subsection 304-10(4) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997

Author: The Tax Institute

Published Date: 4 Feb 2022


Sorry, this is subscriber only content.

If you're not yet a subscriber, to gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.

Already a Subscriber? Login now

Already a Subscriber? Login now

The Tax Institute welcomes the opportunity to make a submission to the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) in relation to Draft Taxation Determination TD 2021/D6 Income tax: tax treatment of a superannuation benefit when the Commissioner exercises the discretion in subsection 304-10(4) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Draft TD) and Draft Practice Statement Law Administration PS LA 2021/D3 Superannuation - Commissioner's discretion where members receive benefits in breach of legislative requirements (Draft PS LA), (collectively the Draft Guidance).

In the development of this submission, we have consulted with our National Superannuation Committee to prepare a considered response which represents the views of the broader membership of The Tax Institute.

Subsection 304-10(4) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) provides that a superannuation member does not need to include an amount covered by subsection 304-10(1) in their assessable income where the Commissioner is satisfied that it would be unreasonable to do so. The Draft Guidance provides further detail regarding the relevant factors and circumstances in which the Commissioner may exercise this discretion.

Although we broadly welcome greater clarity around how the Commissioner will exercise his discretion in respect of subsection 304-10(4), we consider that there are a number of issues that should be further expanded upon in the Draft Guidance. In particular, we consider that the Draft PS LA should provide further guidance and clarity on the differences between an illegal early access scheme and a genuine mistake by a member or trustee. We also consider that the events and circumstances following an incorrect withdrawal should be examined and appropriately dealt with, ensuring that the system promotes self-correction and redress of mistakes. Finally, we consider that the Draft Guidance should take into account the taxpayer's surrounding events or circumstances, such as the amount of the tax-free component that would be assessed were the discretion not exercised, and the real cost of penalties on taxpayers.


  • Published By:The Tax Institute
  • Published On:4 Feb 2022

The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.

Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))


The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009. 

Copyright Statement

All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.

Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.



Share this page