Business taxation Large business SME & family business

Treasury Laws Amendment (2023 Measures No. 1) Bill 2023

Author: The Tax Institute

Published Date: 5 Apr 2023


Sorry, this is subscriber only content.

If you're not yet a subscriber, to gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.

Already a Subscriber? Login now

Already a Subscriber? Login now

The Tax Institute welcomes the opportunity to make a submission to the Senate Standing Committee on Economics (Committee) in respect of its inquiry and report on the Treasury Laws Amendment (2023 Measures No. 1) Bill 2023 (Bill) and accompanying explanatory memorandum (EM). 

In the development of this submission, we have closely consulted with our National Large Business and International Technical Committee and National Small and Medium Enterprises Technical Committee to prepare a considered response that represents the views of the broader membership of The Tax Institute.

The Bill contains several key changes that impact taxpayers and tax practitioners. These include:

  • Schedule 3 – Government response to the review of the Tax Practitioners Board;
  • Schedule 4 – Off-market share buy-backs;
  • Schedule 5 – Franked distributions funded by capital raisings.

The Tax Institute, in conjunction with several other professional bodies and associations (together the Joint Bodies), is a co-signatory for a submission to the Committee with respect to Schedule 3 of the Bill. Our views on Schedule 3 are reflected in the Joint Bodies’ submission and are not reiterated in this submission.

Schedule 4 of the Bill contains a measure that is intended to align the capital raising activities of public companies. However, as currently drafted, the provisions result in different capital gains tax (CGT) treatment between off-market share buy-backs and selective share reductions.

The Tax Institute is of the view that Schedule 5 of the Bill requires further explanation and clarity regarding the scope and purpose of the proposed measure. We consider that the scope of Schedule 5 goes beyond the original policy intent contained in the Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook 2016-17 (MYEFO announcement). Our members have also raised concerns about the requirements in the proposed measure that will result in the arrangement becoming an unfrankable distribution. In particular:

  • the established practice requirement is likely to unfairly target private groups and companies with irregular distribution patterns;
  • the purpose test has a lower threshold than other anti-avoidance provisions, resulting in a larger number of arrangements being captured than originally intended; and
  • the disproportionate effect of the measure making an entire distribution unfrankable, even if only a small percentage is sourced from a capital raising that is within scope.


  • Published By:The Tax Institute
  • Published On:5 Apr 2023

The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.

Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))


The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009. 

Copyright Statement

All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.

Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.


Business taxation Large business SME & family business Capital & structuring

Share this page