Publication date: 06 Apr 98 |
Source: THE TAX INSTITUTE
The Taxation Institute of Australia has accused the ATO of selectively using statistics as a scare tactic to infer multi-national companies are not paying their fair share of tax.
It views the conclusions drawn from the statistics by the ATO as both biased and unfounded.
The statistics are collected by the ATO from schedule 25A, part of the tax return submitted by companies.
Schedule 25A seeks information about related party transactions with overseas entities.
"The ATO statistics reported recently in the media included companies with related party
transactions of as little as a single Australian dollar," commented Michael Happell, a
Partner with Price Waterhouse and the TIA's representative on the ATO's Transfer
"How could this level of transaction be a contributing factor toward tax losses being
claimed by some of these companies, which is the conclusion that the ATO has drawn
and which is described as an issue of great concern?
"In fact the full statistics show that companies with related party transactions represent less
than 2 per cent of the total taxpayer population but pay 46 per cent of total company tax.
"How can the ATO therefore infer that they are not paying their 'fair share?"
Mr Happell said the ATO was clearly using the statistics as a scare tactic.
Even the ATO's own transfer pricing audit program was not showing results to support this
level of concern.
"The use of statistics implies a level of profit shifting which is not occurring in practice,"
said Mr Happell.
"It should be reiterated that any increase in related party transactions results from an economic phenomena caused by the globalisation of business. It does not flow from some
conspiracy by multi-nationals to minimise their tax."
Mr Happell said the irony was that tax jurisdictions around the world were all claiming
that profits were being shifted offshore.
"If that is the case, where are they being shifted to?" He asked.
In Australia the dividend imputation system provided a real incentive for Australian companies
to bring their profits home so that shareholders could benefit from the franking credits
accruing from the payment of Australian tax.
Mr Happell said the TIA conceded that the ATO had a right to investigate an alleged profit
shifting practices but believed it should not prejudice such investigations by the use of
"Prejudging causes tax auditors to work with a 'guilty until proven innocent' mindset which
is, in the long term, only going to be detrimental to the ATO and to Australian business."