Source: Australian Tax Forum Journal Article
Published Date: 1 Apr 2016
The penalties triggered by involvement in schemes designed to reduce tax?related liabilities are important elements of the penalty regime of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth). Both the scheme penalty applicable to taxpayers and the promoter penalty include a requirement that it is reasonable to conclude that an entity that entered into or carried out the scheme did so with the sole or dominant purpose of that entity or another entity obtaining a scheme benefit from the scheme. Although the phrasing of these tests borrows from the general anti?avoidance rule of Pt IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), they differ in several important respects.
This article examines the broader context and legislative history of these two scheme penalties as well as relevant court and tribunal decisions in order to determine the preferred construction of the purpose test in each case. In particular, this article considers whether these tests are, or should be, purely objective in nature or whether they admit into consideration the actual, subjective purpose of an entity taking part in the scheme.
The distinction between fixtures and chattels - part 2: income tax issues - Journal 01 Oct 2022
The distinction between fixtures and chattels - part 1: the general law of fixtures and state taxes - Journal 01 Aug 2022
A critical analysis of the tax treatment of dealings under Australian domestic emissions reduction and abatement frameworks - Journal 01 Jun 2011
Cross border employee share and option plans: Distinguishing employment income from investor gains - Journal 01 Jan 2006
Taxing Crime: The Application of Income Tax To Illegal Activities - Journal 01 Jul 2005
Superannuation and expatriate employees in Australia - Journal 01 Sep 2001
Bonus Shares: An Opportunity to Reconsider the Proper Basis for Taxation - Journal 01 Oct 1995
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.