Source: Australian Tax Forum Journal Article
Published Date: 1 Sep 2013
Taxpayers’ tax attributes (the focus in this paper is on tax losses, both revenue and CGT losses) are extinguished on death, and they are not available to the deceased’s [trust] estate or beneficiaries. This extinguishment rule stands in stark contrast to the rules that apply upon the death of a stakeholder in a company or a fixed trust with tax losses. Here, through the fiction of “continuity of life”, there is no extinguishment rule. Further, the extinguishment rule is also anomalous in the context of the extremely generous treatment given to the “event of death” throughout many other areas of the income tax. The death of a taxpayer is overwhelmingly treated as an occasion where relief is given. No doubt, the extremely generous treatment is, in part, designed to avoid the appearance of a “death duty”. Yet, the extinguishment rule has not attracted the same concessional treatment.
This article compares the tax treatment of death where tax losses are owned directly with the situation where tax losses are “owned” through entities. The article also compares the extinguishment rule with the concessional treatment of death involved in a number of the most important areas of the income tax. The conclusion of the article is that the current extinguishment rule is inequitable and anomalous, and its continuance is difficult to justify.
Australia's denial of depreciation deductions for second-hand assets used in residential rental properties: rationales appear obscure - Journal 01 Jul 2022
Franked distributions of trusts: systematic method of allocating them and other taxable income, with analysis of defective provisions - Journal 01 Oct 2021
Myer isolated transactions doctrine (first strand) at 33-year anniversary - Journal 01 Aug 2020
The age of the home worker - Part 2: Calculation of home occupancy expense deductions, deduction apportionment and partial loss of CGT main residence exemption - Journal 01 Apr 2019
The age of the home worker - Part 1: Deductibility of home occupancy expenses - Journal 01 Dec 2018
Recording entitlement rule in trust streaming provisions allows for creation of mismatches - Journal 01 Apr 2016
Pattern of distributions test for discretionary trusts: Defects reveal questionable policy design and implementation - Journal 01 Aug 2015
Defective pattern of distributions test guarantees revenue loss usage - Journal 01 Oct 2014
Managing losses - Traps for the unwary - Presentation 18 May 2010
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.