Source: The Tax Specialist Journal Article
Published Date: 1 Oct 2014
Most discretionary trusts will be family trusts under Australian tax law. For some discretionary trusts, though, the constraints associated with being a family trust are unacceptable. For these trusts with losses, the loss-access qualifying rules will be relevant. The rules that apply in this situation have received little attention. This article analyses the two key rules that may be relevant to a discretionary trust, namely, the revenue loss usage exclusion rule in s 95(1) where a beneficiary does not incur the related economic loss, and the pattern of distributions test (PODT) in the trust loss rules.
The conclusion of the article is that for most discretionary trusts, the s 95(1) loss usage exclusion rule will not prohibit revenue loss usage. Surprisingly, though, the design of the PODT has not taken full account of the flexibility inherent in many modern discretionary trusts. The result is that through a naturally occurring circumstance or some basic planning, the PODT will rarely cause a discretionary trust to lose access to its revenue losses.
Australia's denial of depreciation deductions for second-hand assets used in residential rental properties: rationales appear obscure
- Journal
01 Jul 2022
Franked distributions of trusts: systematic method of allocating them and other taxable income, with analysis of defective provisions
- Journal
01 Oct 2021
Myer isolated transactions doctrine (first strand) at 33-year anniversary
- Journal
01 Aug 2020
The age of the home worker - Part 2: Calculation of home occupancy expense deductions, deduction apportionment and partial loss of CGT main residence exemption
- Journal
01 Apr 2019
The age of the home worker - Part 1: Deductibility of home occupancy expenses
- Journal
01 Dec 2018
Recording entitlement rule in trust streaming provisions allows for creation of mismatches
- Journal
01 Apr 2016
Pattern of distributions test for discretionary trusts: Defects reveal questionable policy design and implementation
- Journal
01 Aug 2015
Extinguishment of tax attributes (eg losses) on death under Australia's income tax is anomalous and inequitable
- Journal
01 Sep 2013
Managing losses - Traps for the unwary
- Presentation
18 May 2010
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Details
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
("TTI")
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.
Tags