Miscellaneous 2008

CTP custodian - The aftermath

Source: National

Published Date: 10 Jul 2008


Sorry, this is subscriber only content.

If you're not yet a subscriber, to gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.

Already a Subscriber? Login now

Already a Subscriber? Login now

This paper considers cases following the High Court's decision in CPT Custodian, including:

  • Halloran v Minister Administering National Parks & Wildlife Act
  • Pearson v FCT
  • Commonwealth Managed Investments Ltd v CSR (WA)
  • CPT Manager Ltd v CSR (NSW)
  • GTN Nominees.

The paper also examines the differing views as to whether a unit holder can have a "beneficial interest" in the trust assets, and will review the provisions dealing with CPT Custodian that have recently been introduced in South Australia.


The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.

Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))


The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009. 

Copyright Statement

All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.

Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.


Miscellaneous 2008

Share this page