Source: Australian Tax Forum Journal Article
Published Date: 1 Jun 2020
Historically, retirement income policy has responded to women's relatively limited ability to secure an independent retirement income through either a state age pension or a surviving spouse benefit, payable to widows upon death of their partner. The shift towards accumulation superannuation schemes in countries such as Australia has made surviving spouse pensions less relevant and left many women financially dependent on their partner in retirement. The economic risks faced by many women within retired couple households as a result of this shift have been neglected by policy makers, at least in part because of the pervasive assumption that intra-household resource allocations are beyond the purview of government. This paper aims to address the resulting policy gap by examining two broad approaches to protect economic outcomes for partnered older women in Australia's superannuation-based retirement income system. One approach features measures aimed at enhancing women's capacity to influence decision-making on household superannuation wealth; and the other focuses on regulatory settings that can influence who owns superannuation wealth within the household. We conclude 214 (2020) 35 AUSTRALIAN TAX FORUM by identifying specific opportunities to address imbalances in the entitlements of older Australian women to the superannuation assets held in their households.
Income equalisation: Is all fair in primary production and tax law? - Journal 01 Jul 2019
The tax on feminine hygiene products: Is this reasonable policy? - Journal 01 Oct 2017
Gender impact analysis and the taxation of retirement savings in Australia - Journal 01 Dec 2015
Promoting smart travel through tax policy - Journal 01 Aug 2015
Retirement savings and gender: An Australasian comparison - Journal 01 Dec 2013
Unscrambling the egg: Reform pathways in the tax transfer system - Journal 01 Jun 2011
Introduction to taxation of trusts - Presentation 29 Mar 2011
Understanding Australian small businesses and the drivers of compliance costs: a grounded theory approach - Journal 01 Jul 2009
Is there a perception of revenue bias on the part of the ATO in private binding rulings on large, complex issues? - Journal 01 Sep 2008
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.